Close this search box.

Conference Questions 2024 Online Feedback Form

  • Homepage
  • >
  • Conference Questions 2024 Online Feedback Form

Use this form to submit your group’s responses directly to the CER Delegates to Conference. If you experience any issues with this form, please send your feedback to the delegates via email at 

Important notes:

  • This feedback form is only intended for English-speaking Groups within the Continental European Region of AA GB. If your group is in the UK, or outside of Europe, then your responses ought to be submitted to your local Region Delegates, usually via your local Intergroup. More details on intergroups and regions in CER and the UK can be found in our Structure Handbook (Folder Handbooks in our AA GB Members Library).
  • Conference 2024 runs from 12th – 14th April 2024. To give the Delegates time to review your answers please submit them before the end of March 2024.
  • All feedback is appreciated – even just one answer to a single question!
  • Consider the contribution to the carrying of the message, financial and practical implications when deliberating each question.

Committee 1

1. Conference is asked to consider, and make recommendations, for a comprehensive overhaul of the service structure. Members' availability for service is challenged by unprecedented demands in the workplace - greater job insecurities and pressures on time.
A streamlining of disciplines could reduce persistent vacancies and make carrying the message more effective in changing times.
There are 12 service disciplines at Intergroups and Regions, in addition to the positions of Chair and Secretary. Many vacancies exist also within Board subcommittees. Could Employment, Health and Public Information be unified within Public Affairs? Could Electronic Communications and Telephones become Responding?
Is Young People's Liaison essential as a separate discipline? Carrying the message with greater effectiveness ought to take priority over the protection of existing individual disciplines. There are enormous changes in society - AA is part of society, not removed from it.

Service and Structure Handbooks
Vacancies in AA Service News
Vacancies in the Confidential Directory
12 Traditions
12 Concepts

Any comprehensive review of the service structure should be based on the Fellowship's experiences.


Currently, the fellowship allows observers to participate in different tiers of the service structure. Any member of the fellowship has the opportunity to attend a groups business meeting, irrespective of their membership in that particular group. Additionally, members are afforded the chance to attend and observe Intergroup and Region meetings.

This provides invaluable opportunities for many members to learn more about the service structure and can be an important step for individuals growing in service in AA. However, the option to observe the Conference is presently unavailable. This lack of accessibility gives Conference an air of exclusivity, leaving many members of Alcoholics Anonymous unaware of its existence and not exerting their right to participation.

Since 2020, Conference delegates have had the option to attend online. Utilising existing technology, could Conference not be made more inclusive by extending this online access to the entire Fellowship? Such a move would allow members to observe proceedings, granting them the same behind-the-scenes view that is presently available at Intergroup and Region meetings, providing greater transparency. This opportunity to see conference and their trusted servants in action may also help members to become better informed and could encourage some to consider becoming Conference Delegates themselves in the future.

As Conference is already being conducted in a hybrid format, the platform's settings could be adjusted to ensure that observers cannot participate in proceedings, for example by ensuring that they cannot activate their cameras, remain muted throughout, and display only their names rather than any profile pictures.
The prudent reserve has regularly been exceeded for several years now – see annual reports 2018/9/20/21 - with Groups sending surplus pot money to Intergroup, Intergroup to Region, and Region to GSO. These surpluses are opportunities for primary purpose work both locally and nationally, so would the Fellowship discuss and propose guidance on how the money might be spent both locally by Region/Intergroup and nationally by the Board to keep surpluses as low as possible?

It is acknowledged and understood that income streams are difficult to predict but in the past, whenever financial pressure has been foreseen, the members have responded positively to a request for increased donations via the Pot and there is no reason to suggest this would not be repeated, even in the difficult economic climates. Budgets could always be reviewed if needs be.

Committee 2

1. Could the conference please give more clarification and detail on situations in which making direct amends is against the spirit of the steps if it is likely to cause harm?

Context: locally there are various traditions of sponsorship in which sponsees have been told to make these amends e.g. victims of sexual assault have been told to get in touch with their assailants to make amends for harbouring resentment against them (this has included a situation where the sexual assault in question was incestuous); people who have been subject to restraining orders or threatened with restraining orders have been told to make direct contact with those requesting restraining orders to apologise for causing them fear and distress.

The concern is that commands to make these kinds of "amends" bring the Fellowship as a whole and our 12 Step programme into disrepute (particularly in the eyes of other organisations such as Rape Crisis) and has constituted a perceived barrier to being accepted as a member of our Fellowship.

Would Conference consider if the suggestion in step 9 "unless to do so would injure them or others," applies to the sponsee as well?

See Context above See three-fold pamphlet, 'Questions and Answers on Sponsorship'
2. Would Conference share experience on how AA members may communicate with each other on matters affecting AA as a whole, as well as their specific roles? Good communication between members should be encouraged without promoting specific platforms.

Ways Intergroup & Region members can communicate to exchange ideas or updates on service: • PI Service news, compiled by the PI Sub Committee, and mailed from GSO to any AA member who signed up. This has been discontinued. Last issue Sept 2021. • AA Service news – quarterly, sent to GSR's and service holders, plus a mailing list if requested from Sharon at GSO, and generally includes a few pages on Service reports, (8 / 52 pages in Summer 2023 edition, 5/26 Spring 2023). • Email to AAs in service, with contact via the Confidential Directory. The Directory is only accessible to those with e-mail addresses with a password issued by GSO. The GSB set strict rules about what can be shared and regulate who may have access. • Intergroup and Region reports – can be shared via their respective meetings & officers. This is potentially patchy due to the inconsistency of roles being filled and the vacancies throughout the structure. In practice, GSR's share back the minimum of information to groups, so many members will be unaware of what is going on. There is a wealth of experience and enthusiasm around GB, yet much of this does not get shared.

Committee 3

Question 1.

Question 1.

Committee 4

Question 1.

Committee 5

Question 1.

Committee 6

Question 1.

Latest Updated meetings

Are you an alcoholic?

To help you decide whether you might have a problem with drinking, we’ve prepared these 12 questions.

Go to 12 Questions

How did you get sober?

Latest Arena Articles